False equivalency: A misleading comparison where the comparison targets are forcibly balanced while ignoring relevant differences. For example, claiming that banning guns also requires banning cars. Both cause harm to human life, but guns are designed for lethality and are closely linked to crime, whereas automobiles are meant for transportation and sometimes cause fatalities in traffic accidents as side effects. Comparing these two as if they are the same constitutes a false equivalency. Similarly, saying that apples and oranges are the same because they are both fruits and round is also a false equivalency. We are easily misled by such false comparisons. - Joseph’s “just my thoughts”
For humans to be born and survive, the world should grant humans the right to possess, that is, ownership, which must be guaranteed. Ownership is a right that has been granted since birth, so it is called an “absolute right.” In the online realm, this ownership is established by setting up an ID and password. When this ID and password match, we can engage in social activities such as online banking or shopping. The password is a personal identifier known only to me. No one else knows it, and when that secrecy is broken, it becomes invalid. However, to enforce ownership online, I must also share my password with the service provider. At that point, the provided password is no longer a secret. There are many contradictions in the world. - Joseph’s “just my thoughts”